The hearing on site allocation for Claygate was to have been on Friday 10 May 2024. However, Elmbridge Borough Council has asked the Inspector to pause the hearings for 5 weeks, for the reasons given in their letter of 30 April, see this link.
The Inspector has reluctantly agreed to pause the examination until the week of 16 June 2024, see this link
ELMBRIDGE LOCAL PLAN
HEARING AGENDA
DAY 11 Thursday 9 May 2024
Morning session – 1000 – 1300
Matter 9 Site Allocations
The Inspector’s MIQ’s will form the basis for the discussion with particular
reference to the following matters:
Key points for discussion
- Site Selection MEthodology - use of the PPG
- Approach to site allocations within the Plan (MIQ 8.6)
Participants:
Elmbridge Council
Andrew Black Consulting obo Esher Rugby Club
BVA Planning obo Chalford Property Company Ltd
Lichfields obo Burwin Investments Ltd
Woolf Bond Planning obo Claygate House Investments Ltd and MJS investments Ltd
Solve Planning obo Lionel Frewin/Solve Planning obo Acre
Nexus Planning obo Charterhouse Strategic Land
Home Builders Federation
Bidwells obo Burhill Development Ltd
Vail Williams obo Haleon Ltd
Afternoon session – 1400 – 1700
• Chapter 9 – Policy wording
• Paragraphs 9.1-9.5
• Approach to density and the evidence base
• Car park sites (MIQ 8.11)
Participants:
As above
ELMBRIDGE LOCAL PLAN
HEARING AGENDA
DAY 12 Friday 10 May 2024
Morning session – 1000 – 1300
Matter 9 Site Allocations
The Inspector’s MIQ’s will form the basis for the discussion with particular
reference to the following matters:
Key points for discussion
Claygate
- Are the allocations justified by the evidence base?
- Is the extent of each site correctly identified?
- Are the requirements for each site clear and justified (see MIQ 8.6, the Council’s response does not address the concerns raised)
- Have all of the site constraints, development mix, and viability considerations been taken into account?
Participants:
Elmbridge Council
Andrew Black Consulting obo Esher Rugby Club
Woolf Bond Planning obo Claygate House Investments Ltd and MJS investments Ltd
Solve Planning obo Lionel Frewin/Solve Planning obo Acre
Nexus Planning obo Charterhouse Strategic Land
Vail Williams obo Haleon Ltd
Afternoon session – 1400 – 1700
- Cobham, Oxshott and Stoke D’AbernonAre the allocations justified by the evidence base?
- Is the extent of each site correctly identified?
- Are the requirements for each site clear and justified (see MIQ 8.6, the Council’s response does not address the concerns raised)
- Have all of the site constraints, development mix and viability considerations been taken into account?
Participants:
As above
ELMBRIDGE LOCAL PLAN
HEARING AGENDA
DAY 13 Tuesday 18 June 2024
Morning session – 1000 – 1300
Matter 9 Site Allocations
Key points for discussion
Thames Ditton, Long Ditton, Hinchley Wood and Western Green
- Are the allocations justified by the evidence base?
- Is the extent of each site correctly identified?
- Are the requirements for each site clear and justified (see MIQ 8.6, the Council’s response does not address the concerns raised)
- Have all of the site constraints, development mix and viability considerations been taken into account?
Participants:
Elmbridge Council
Andrew Black Consulting obo Esher Rugby Club
Woolf Bond Planning obo Claygate House Investments Ltd and MJS investments Ltd
Solve Planning obo Lionel Frewin/Solve Planning obo Acre
Nexus Planning obo Charterhouse Strategic Land
Afternoon session – 1400 – 1700
Esher
- Are the allocations justified by the evidence base?
- Is the extent of each site correctly identified?
- Are the requirements for each site clear and justified (see MIQ 8.6, the Council’s response does not address the concerns raised)
- Have all of the site constraints, development mix and viability considerations been taken into account?
Participants:
As above
ELMBRIDGE LOCAL PLAN
HEARING AGENDA
DAY 14 Wednesday 19 June 2024
Morning session – 1000 – 1300
Matter 9 Site Allocations
Key points for discussion
Hersham and Molesey
- Are the allocations justified by the evidence base?
- Is the extent of each site correctly identified?
- Are the requirements for each site clear and justified (see MIQ 8.6, the Council’s response does not address the concerns raised)
- Have all of the site constraints, development mix, anedd viability considerations been taken into account?
Participants:
Elmbridge Council
Andrew Black Consulting obo Esher Rugby Club
Woolf Bond Planning obo Claygate House Investments Ltd and MJS Investments Ltd
Solve Planning obo Lionel Frewin/Solve Planning obo Acre
Nexus Planning obo Charterhouse Strategic Land
Afternoon session – 1400 – 1700
Walton on Thames
- Are the allocations justified by the evidence base?
- Is there extent of each site correctly identified?
- Are the requirements for each site clear and justified (see MIQ 8.6, the Council’s response does not address the concerns raised)
- Have all of the site constraints, development mix and viability considerations been taken into account?
Participants:
As above
ELMBRIDGE LOCAL PLAN
HEARING AGENDA
DAY 15 Thursday 20 June 2024
Morning session – 1000 – 1300
Matter 9 Site Allocations
Key points for discussion
Weybridge
- Are the allocations justified by the evidence base?
- Is the extent for each site correctly justified?
- Are the requirements for each site clear and justified (see MIQ 8.6, the Council’s response does not address the concerns raised)
- Have all of the site constraints, development mix and viability considerations been taken into account?
Participants:
Elmbridge Council
Andrew Black Consulting obo Esher Rugby Club
Woolf Bond Planning obo Claygate House Investments Ltd and MJS investments Ltd
Solve Planning obo Lionel Frewin/Solve Planning obo Acre
Nexus Planning obo Charterhouse Strategic Land
Vail Williams obo Haleon Ltd
Afternoon session – 1400 – 1700
SANG session
Participants:
Elmbridge Council
Carter Jonas